{"id":1099,"date":"2016-03-31T12:44:03","date_gmt":"2016-03-31T10:44:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.respublica.org.al\/?p=1099"},"modified":"2016-03-31T12:44:03","modified_gmt":"2016-03-31T10:44:03","slug":"pergjigje-ndaj-transparenca-al-e-verteta-e-reklamave-te-ministrise-se-mbrojtjes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.respublica.org.al\/web\/?p=1099","title":{"rendered":"P\u00ebrgjigje ndaj Transparenca.al. E v\u00ebrteta e reklamave t\u00eb Ministris\u00eb s\u00eb Mbrojtjes."},"content":{"rendered":"

\"birce-hasko-tellall-trifoni-ne-f-320x180\"<\/a>Dje, portali i njohur i Qeveris\u00eb \u201ctransparenca.al\u201d ka \u201csqaruar\u201d<\/a> se shkaku, sipas tyre, p\u00ebr mosdh\u00ebnien e kontratave t\u00eb reklamave p\u00ebr 2009-2013 ishte sepse dokumentat e k\u00ebrkuara nga Res Publica ishin sekret hetimor. Sipas tyre, Ministria e kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb ditur k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, por Res Publica e d\u00ebrgoi \u00e7\u00ebshjen n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb. Sipas tyre, pas ankimit ton\u00eb n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Apelit, ndodhi q\u00eb hetimi u mbyll dhe dokumentat nuk ishin m\u00eb sekret dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye Gjykata pranoi padin\u00eb. P\u00ebrpjekje e mir\u00eb kjo e transparenca.al, por q\u00eb nuk thot\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn.<\/p>\n

Meq\u00ebn\u00ebse lajmi i par\u00eb u vu n\u00eb dyshim dhe versioni i transparenca.al pretendohet t\u00eb jet\u00eb \u201ce v\u00ebrteta\u201d, po japim edhe nj\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, sipas parimit \u201ce treta, e v\u00ebrteta\u201d, si m\u00eb posht\u00eb:<\/p>\n

S\u00eb pari, Ministria e Mbrojtjes nuk u p\u00ebrgjigj kurr\u00eb as ndaj k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs dhe as ndaj ankimit administrativ t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb m\u00eb pas, para se Res Publica t\u00eb niste gjyqin.<\/p>\n

S\u00eb dyti, n\u00ebn hetim ishin vet\u00ebm reklamat e vitit 2013 sepse pretendohej q\u00eb ato ishin b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e fushat\u00ebs zgjedhore n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me Kodin Zgjedhor. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, reklamat e viteve 2009, 2010, 2011 dhe 2012 NUK ishin objekt i ndonj\u00eb hetimi.<\/p>\n

Gjykata e Apelit vendosi t\u00eb detyroj\u00eb Ministrin\u00eb e Mbrojtjes q\u00eb t\u00eb jap\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb dokumentat e k\u00ebrkuara p\u00ebr vitet 2009-2012, pik\u00ebrisht sepse k\u00ebto dosje (ndryshe nga ato t\u00eb vitit 2013) nuk kishin p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb asnj\u00ebher\u00eb sekret hetimor, ndryshe nga sa pretendon Transparenca.al se gjykata pranoi padin\u00eb sepse hetimi u mbyll gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs s\u00eb gjykimit.<\/p>\n

Vendimin e kemi publikuar online (kliko k\u00ebtu)<\/a>, n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn shqipe, vet\u00ebm 11 faqe, por p\u00ebr t\u2019ia leht\u00ebsuar pun\u00ebn operator\u00ebve t\u00eb Transparenca.al, po u japim edhe nj\u00eb ekstrakt nga faqja 9:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026konkludohet se ndalimi i pal\u00ebs s\u00eb paditur p\u00ebr t’i dh\u00ebn\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse informacionin e k\u00ebrkuar konsiston vet\u00ebm n\u00eb ndalimin e dh\u00ebnies s\u00eb dokumenteve zyrtare q\u00eb i perkasin vitit 2013<\/strong>, pjese e procedimit penal t\u00eb nisur. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebr vitet 2009,2010, 2011 dhe 2012, nuk rezultoi e provuar n\u00eb gjykim, madje as nuk u pretendua nga pala e paditur<\/strong>, ekzistenca e pengesave t\u00eb ligjshme<\/strong>, kjo e fundit ka detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dispozicion t\u00eb pal\u00ebs padit\u00ebse t\u00eb gjith\u00eb informacionin e k\u00ebrkuar\u2026\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Shprehim keqardhje p\u00ebr faktin se kur konstatohet se Transparenca.al g\u00ebnjen nj\u00eb her\u00eb, t\u00eb krijohet natyrsh\u00ebm dyshimi se kjo mund t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb edhe p\u00ebr \u201ct\u00eb v\u00ebrtetat\u201d e tjera q\u00eb ndodhen aty.<\/p>\n

Do t\u00eb ishte mir\u00eb q\u00eb Transparenca.al t\u00eb marr\u00eb masa p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrg\u00ebnjeshtruar lajmin e djesh\u00ebm, p\u00ebr t\u00eb mos cenuar besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e saj, si dhe, pse jo, t\u00eb publikoj\u00eb vet\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha kontratat q\u00eb k\u00ebrkohen, pavar\u00ebsisht se kan\u00eb kaluar dy vjet pritjeje dhe tashm\u00eb ka edhe nj\u00eb vendim gjyq\u00ebsor t\u00eb form\u00ebs s\u00eb prer\u00eb.