Me 31 tetor Gjykata Kushtetuese doli me nj\u00eb njoftim publik ku thuhej se rr\u00ebzohej k\u00ebrkesa e shoqat\u00ebs s\u00eb qiramarr\u00ebsve q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb lirojn\u00eb banesat, pron\u00eb e ish-pronar\u00ebve. Mir\u00ebpo nuk po na dalin fare llogarit\u00eb me ligjin. Neni 72 i ligjit p\u00ebr organizimin dhe funksionimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese flet qart\u00eb kur thot\u00eb se: \u201cVendimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese shpallet i arsyetuar\u2026.\u201d.<\/p>\n
Sikur kjo t\u00eb duket e paqart\u00eb, na vjen n\u00eb ndihm\u00eb edhe neni 13 i Rregullores s\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs, i cili thot\u00eb: \u201c\u2026Pas \u00e7do shpallje vendimi nj\u00eb kopje d\u00ebrgohet p\u00ebr botim n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare. Vendimi pasqyrohet edhe n\u00eb faqen zyrtare t\u00eb internetit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs n\u00eb form\u00ebn e tij t\u00eb plot\u00eb.\u201c\u2026<\/p>\n
Interesant \u00ebsht\u00eb fakti q\u00eb vendimi i dat\u00ebs 31 tetor u shpall publikisht me an\u00eb t\u00eb mediave nga vet\u00eb Gjykata Kushtetuese, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb as nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i arsyetuar, as nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebrguar p\u00ebr botim n\u00eb Fletoren Zyrtare dhe as n\u00eb internet nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb publikuar n\u00eb form\u00ebn e tij t\u00eb plot\u00eb, apo ndonj\u00eb form\u00eb m\u00eb gjysmake. Fare, fare\u2026<\/p>\n
Madje n\u00eb internet na del kjo pamje: Menj\u00ebher\u00eb pas Vendimit nr. 49 dt. 26 korrik 2012 vjen n\u00eb radh\u00eb Vendimi tjet\u00ebr me nr. 50 dt. 01 n\u00ebntor 2012 q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim komplet tjet\u00ebr. Vendimi i dat\u00ebs 31 tetor, q\u00eb duhej t\u00eb ishte n\u00eb mesin e k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb dyve, nuk del askund dhe duket se nuk ka as bilet\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u ulur n\u00eb ndonj\u00eb radh\u00eb midis 49 dhe 50, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 se t\u2019i vihet nj\u00eb num\u00ebr ski\u00e7 49,5\u2026<\/p>\n
Shum\u00eb e \u00e7uditshme apo jo\u2026 dhe k\u00ebto gj\u00ebra ndodhin me rastin e nj\u00eb vendimi q\u00eb prek interesat e mbi 30 mij\u00eb shqiptar\u00ebve, 15 mij\u00eb qiraxhinj nga nj\u00ebra an\u00eb dhe t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn 15 mij\u00eb pronar\u00eb nga ana tjet\u00ebr. K\u00ebto gj\u00ebra ndodhin edhe kur Gjykata e Strasburgut k\u00ebrkon vendimin e zbardhur ta shoh\u00eb. \u00c7far\u00eb t\u2019i themi Strasburgut? Ec e bindi ata q\u00eb gjykata jon\u00eb ka marr\u00eb vendim por nuk e ka arsyetuar akoma\u2026 Kam frik\u00eb se nuk do na besojn\u00eb. P\u00ebr ta \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eblloj sikur t\u2019i thuash q\u00eb toka \u00ebsht\u00eb e shesht\u00eb dhe jo rrumbullake\u2026<\/p>\n
Gjith\u00e7ka mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb, por \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e \u00e7uditshme t\u00eb jemi para nj\u00eb vendimi tipik final. Sikur Gjykata Kushtetuese t\u00eb kishte rr\u00ebzuar vet\u00ebm k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr pezullimin e aktit dhe t\u00eb kishte vazhduar shqyrtimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes at\u00ebher\u00eb do kishte me shum\u00eb kuptim kjo situat\u00eb, por jo, flitet p\u00ebr rr\u00ebzimin e t\u00eb gjith\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.<\/p>\n
Nuk dua t\u00eb besoj se Gjykata Kushtetuese na ka th\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00ebn z\u00eb se \u201cNe po e rr\u00ebzojm\u00eb nj\u00eb her\u00eb dhe pastaj na lini ca koh\u00eb t\u00eb gjejm\u00eb ca arsye. Nuk kemi rrug\u00eb tjet\u00ebr. Vet\u00ebm po t\u00eb shkelim nenin 72 t\u00eb ligjit, dhe nenin 13 t\u00eb rregullores do arrijm\u00eb t\u00eb japim vendimin pas 6 muajsh dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht mos pezullojm\u00eb aktin\u2026\u201d. Dreq o pun\u00eb, nuk di \u00e7\u2019t\u00eb besoj\u00eb njeriu\u2026<\/p>\n
Kjo m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb vepruari na mbush me dyshime q\u00eb vendimi \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb pa u studiuar \u00e7do element i k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs dhe pa u diskutuar \u00e7do fjali q\u00eb do duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbaj\u00eb vendimi i arsyetuar. Nuk ka faj ligji q\u00eb nuk e preferon k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shpalljeje.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrderisa n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 31 tetor 2012 nuk paska realisht vendim, at\u00ebher\u00eb jemi p\u00ebrpara faktit q\u00eb gjith\u00e7ka mund t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb deri n\u00eb miratimin e versionit p\u00ebrfundimtar. Neni 11 i rregullores e thot\u00eb shqip q\u00eb: \u201cPara se t\u00eb b\u00ebhet votimi p\u00ebrfundimtar, gjyqtari ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb q\u00ebndrim dhe\/ose t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb shtyrjen e diskutimit mbi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen\u201d.<\/p>\n
Gjat\u00eb k\u00ebsaj kohe gjykata do e ket\u00eb mund\u00ebsin\u00eb reale t\u00eb shoh\u00eb vet\u00eb se si pjesa d\u00ebrrmuese nuk do p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb dot kredit\u00eb apo banesat sociale, ndryshe nga pamja optimiste q\u00eb dha ministri Olldashi n\u00eb seanc\u00eb. Ky realitet b\u00ebn vaki t\u00eb ndikoj\u00eb n\u00eb bindjen e brendshme t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ende nuk kan\u00eb votuar p\u00ebr miratimin e versionit p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb vendimit dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb kemi p\u00ebr kallauz vet\u00eb numrat e vendimeve dhe datat q\u00eb nuk mbulohen dot me shosh\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Shpresojm\u00eb t\u00eb jemi thjesht p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb lapsusi t\u00eb administrat\u00ebs, e cila nuk e ka sqaruar mir\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb rr\u00ebzoi gjykata dhe pse e rr\u00ebzoi. Me t\u00eb drejt\u00eb jemi kurioz\u00eb. Meqen\u00ebse kjo situat\u00eb na ka futur n\u00eb bot\u00ebn e \u00e7udirave, do b\u00ebnim mir\u00eb po ta pyesim nj\u00eb her\u00eb vet\u00eb gjykat\u00ebn t\u00eb na e sqaroj\u00eb. Fundja u b\u00ebm\u00eb kurioz\u00eb se deri ku shkon vrima e lepurit t\u00eb bardh\u00eb.<\/p>\n
D. Matlija<\/p>\n